View Full Version : muller ban
steve
27th Aug 2003, 06:38 PM
why 11 days and not 14 as most people take 7 or 14 days off vote now :confused:
Amanda
27th Aug 2003, 06:40 PM
I vote for a 14 day ban!
thommo_fan
27th Aug 2003, 07:06 PM
without doubt a 14 day ban, because a 11 day ban doesnt affect muller in any way.
the MSA might as well not bothered at all with a 11 day ban.
steve
27th Aug 2003, 07:12 PM
how can the fans findout from msa the way it was 11 days only
kestrel
27th Aug 2003, 07:13 PM
Got to be a 14 day ban !!!!!!
JLD
27th Aug 2003, 07:35 PM
Would prefer it to be quoted as a one meeting ban.
Same thing in this instance, but if it's described as a 14 day ban, then if a similar incident takes place when there is a 3 week gap no-one can complain about a precident having been set at 14 days.
Jamie P-E
27th Aug 2003, 08:32 PM
I agree with everyone else a 14 day ban is the answer
McKay
27th Aug 2003, 08:45 PM
phil bennet got a meeting ban in 2001 for something alot less worse than this
redshoes
27th Aug 2003, 09:09 PM
Not the same at all. Bennett got a fine and was unable to pay it so chose to take a one race ban instead.
Le Mans
27th Aug 2003, 10:22 PM
If Muller got a one race ban and Thompson wins the championship by one point then how many real BTCC fans would feel that they have been cheated? Thompson drove poorly this weekend and Muller was almost the best driver out there, Turkington was better. Muller had a good chance of winning the first race but his water temperature rose and he backed off and came second. In the second race he would have won but made a mistake and Turks made a great move on him and he should have come second. If Reid had made a fair pass Reid would be second and Muller would have come third. Reid took himself and Muller into the gravel and Muller got fifth, Reid fourth. I am a racing fan and really get irritated by imature people who prattle on about nice hair and nice guy and attitude and frogs and all sorts of cr@p. Who is the best driver in BTCC 2003?
Nikh_mg
27th Aug 2003, 10:30 PM
Le mans, Reid didnt take Muller into the gravel, if you watch closely, Reid goes through then Muller closes the door and goes for the racing line....where Reid is. They hit eachother and went straight on because thats what happens when cars hit eachother like that, they go straight on, it wasnt Reid locking up, or he would have gone further into the gravel than Muller.
I agree it would be unfair for Thommo to win the championship because his main challenger couldnt race, but someone as filthy as Muller on and off track doesnt deserve the championship either.....O'Neill still could win I think lol
Le Mans
27th Aug 2003, 10:41 PM
Originally posted by Nikh_mg
Le mans, Reid didnt take Muller into the gravel, if yo watch closly, lol
Of course! Muller drove into the gravel on purpose to let Reid go by! And Reid thought it would be a good idea to join him there and let O'Neal and Morrison go past.....
Le Mans
27th Aug 2003, 10:45 PM
Originally posted by Nikh_mg
... i was Reid locking up.......
Hi Anthony!
Nice of you to visit! Tell us about you and Yvan.... how is your neck?
Nikh_mg
28th Aug 2003, 08:51 AM
My keyboard screwed, not my fault. Dont be a fool, Reid didnt take Muller off no, they touched yes, but Ried didnt go for a move that wasnt there
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.9 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.